Guide

Manage photos and files

Review supporting evidence, keep file organization consistent, and make it easier for the team to trust what is in the claim before review, response prep, or delivery.

Claims and EvidenceAll teamsUpdated Mar 12, 2026Step-by-step

Outcome

What this helps you do

Keep claim media organized enough that evidence can actually support decisions, delivery, and later review instead of becoming a pile of hard-to-interpret uploads.

This guide is written for all teams and uses real claimOS screenshots so the instructions map cleanly to the product surface.

Prerequisites

Before you start

  • A claim with uploaded files or media.
  • A shared naming or grouping convention your team can follow.
  • A clear sense of what evidence is still missing or still being collected.

Steps

How to do it

  1. 1Review the incoming evidence set

    Start by checking whether the uploaded files are organized well enough to support actual review and downstream delivery.

  2. 2Separate the high-value evidence from the noise

    Identify which files actually support the current decision, which are duplicates, and which need more context so the team does not treat every upload as equally important.

  3. 3Normalize labels and categories

    Use the claim files surface to bring photos, videos, and documents into consistent folders and labels so later workflows can trust the record.

  4. 4Preview high-value media before major decisions

    Before escalating, exporting, or sending documents outward, confirm that the supporting evidence is visible, relevant, and easy to interpret.

  5. 5Flag missing evidence and assign the next collection action

    If key photos, documents, or supporting notes are missing, make that explicit in the claim and route the next collection step instead of assuming someone will remember.

  6. 6Keep the claim defensible

    Well-managed evidence reduces rework, makes communication easier, and gives future reviewers a cleaner trail of what actually supports the claim.

  7. 7Run a defensibility check before you export or escalate

    Before the file supports a customer update, document send, or escalation, confirm that labels, previews, and the core evidence story all match what the claim is trying to prove.

    If a reviewer would need a narrated walkthrough to understand the file set, stop and simplify the organization before the claim leaves the team.

Screenshots

See the workflow

claimOS evidence review crop showing mission control, launch tasks, and the operating cards that support claim review.
This evidence-focused crop shows how claimOS keeps the next review action close to the supporting media and record context.
claimOS claim-review crop showing at-a-glance cards and the surrounding record context before evidence decisions are made.
The most useful evidence review starts from the record context first so teams know which files matter and which uploads are just noise.
claimOS weather-intel crop showing weather search actions beside queue and record context.
Evidence review gets stronger when teams can quickly see what outside context is still missing before they export or escalate.
claimOS recent-activity module showing the workflow updates a later reviewer will expect to find after files are organized.
A clean evidence set should produce a cleaner activity trail too, so later reviewers can trust both the files and the story around them.

Watch the paired walkthrough

Poster for the photos and files review video showing the evidence-ready operating surface and claim review context.
Walkthrough1:36

See the same workflow in motion

A quick walkthrough of reviewing evidence and keeping file organization trustworthy in claimOS.

See what arrived, what is duplicate, and what evidence is still missing before you reorganize anything.

Watch related walkthrough

FAQ

Common questions

  • How much file organization is enough?

    Organize until a teammate can tell what the key evidence is, what is missing, and what is safe to send or review next. You do not need perfection, but you do need trust.

  • When should we flag missing evidence instead of waiting for it?

    Flag it as soon as the absence could affect review, response prep, or client communication. Missing evidence is easier to manage when it is explicit.

  • Should duplicate or low-value uploads stay in the claim?

    Keep only what helps the team understand the claim. If something is redundant or confusing, relabel, regroup, or remove it from the active evidence path so later review stays clean.

Keep Going

Related guides and walkthroughs

Guide

Use the claims workspace

Work inside the claim detail surface so evidence, next actions, communications, and operational context stay together instead of being reconstructed across separate screens.

Guide

Review weather and storm intel

Use the weather surface to understand risk, support claim review, and add storm context only when it sharpens the next claim decision instead of creating extra noise.

Guide

Send and track e-sign documents

Prepare, send, and monitor e-sign work without losing delivery visibility, signer follow-through, or claim context.

Video

Photos and files review

A quick walkthrough of reviewing evidence and keeping file organization trustworthy in claimOS.