
Second DCA ruling
Florida's Late-Notice Burden Now Depends on Your County
In DeSoto, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas and Sarasota counties, the insurer now carries the burden of proving prejudice from late notice. In Miami-Dade and Monroe, prejudice is still presumed and the insured must rebut it.
Photo: USFWS Southeast Region via Wikimedia Commons
On July 22, 2026, the Second DCA reversed in part a Manatee County summary judgment in SFR Services, LLC a/a/o Wild Oak Bay Owner Association, Inc. v. American Coastal Insurance Co., No. 2D2024-1947.1 Hurricane Irma made landfall September 10, 2017. The association reported its claim July 29, 2020, a 1053-day delay by the trial court's count.1 The panel affirmed that notice was not prompt as a matter of law, then reversed on prejudice and gave the burden to the insurer.
American Coastal wrote the exception itself. Its policy said the insurer has "no duty to provide coverage under this Policy if the failure to comply with the following [listed] duties is prejudicial to [us],"1 and prompt notice sat in that list beside duties like cooperation, which carry no common-law presumption. The structure means the listed duties get treated alike, the court held, so the carrier "removed any presumption of prejudice." The panel certified conflict with Arce v. Citizens, 388 So. 3d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024),2 and sided with Perez v. Citizens, 345 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).3 The Florida Supreme Court has been here: in Arce it declined to exercise jurisdiction and denied review, No. SC2024-0174, April 26, 2024.4
| District | Counties | Who carries the burden | Controlling decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Second | DeSoto, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota | Insurer must prove prejudice | Wild Oak Bay, 2D2024-1947 (2026) |
| Fourth | Broward, Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, Palm Beach, St. Lucie | Insurer must prove prejudice | Perez, 345 So. 3d 893 (2022) |
| Third | Miami-Dade, Monroe | Presumed; insured must rebut | Arce, 388 So. 3d 205 (2024) |
| Sixth | Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Lee, Orange, Osceola, Polk | Presumed; policy language not addressed | Bensen, 401 So. 3d 390 (2023) |
| First | 29 panhandle and north-central counties | Presumed; policy language not addressed | Homeowners Choice v. Clark, 410 So. 3d 99 |
| Fifth | Brevard, Duval, Marion, Seminole, Volusia and nine others | Presumed; no published decision on policy language | n/a |
Venue now decides the burden. Lee and Collier left the Second District for the new Sixth DCA on January 1, 2023,56 so Wild Oak Bay does not reach a Fort Myers or Naples loss. Nothing is final. As of publication no rehearing motion, jurisdictional notice, or mandate had been docketed, and the slip opinion remains subject to revision.1 The insured still lost step one, which is why when you put the carrier on notice decides more files than anything argued later.
Sources cited
- SFR Servs., LLC a/a/o Wild Oak Bay Owner Ass'n v. American Coastal Ins. Co., No. 2D2024-1947 (Fla. 2d DCA July 22, 2026)— Florida Second District Court of Appeal via CourtListener
- Arce v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 388 So. 3d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 3, 2024), No. 3D22-0722— Florida Third District Court of Appeal via CourtListener
- Perez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 345 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 10, 2022), No. 4D21-2944— Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal via CourtListener
- Arce v. Citizens, No. SC2024-0174 — review denied April 26, 2024 (Fla. Supreme Court docket)— Florida Courts ACIS
- Fla. Stat. ch. 35 (2025) — appellate districts by judicial circuit, incl. § 35.044 (Sixth District)— The Florida Senate
- Fla. Stat. § 26.021 (2025) — judicial circuits by county— The Florida Senate
Built for where claims are going.
Carrier automation is not slowing down. claimOS gives the recovery side the same leverage: AI drafting grounded in the file, weather evidence on demand, and a record that holds up under review.